Court bars EMI from offered Pink Floyd downloads

Jack Malvern & , : {}

Pink Floyd won a High Court conflict with EMI yesterday preventing the association from offered manuscript songs as particular tracks.

The band, that sealed up with EMI in 1967, additionally challenged the jot down tag over the turn of royalties paid for songs sole online, but that make a difference stays unresolved.

Lawyers pronounced yesterday that alternative bands competence be examining their contracts to see if they can make use of identical clauses to recover carry out of the sale of their music.

The statute is a serve blow for EMI, that lost the arch senior manager on Tuesday among suggestions that bands together with Pink Floyd and Queen were deliberation withdrawal the company.

Pink Floyd at the Rainbow, 1972

Shrill shrieks, annals and even at one time the throaty tones of Malcolm Muggeridge resonate around the hall

Light and sound: Pink Floyd at the Albert Hall Slow day for headlines until a pinkish pig took wing Related LinksEMI arch Elio Leoni-Sceti walks awayPink Floyd in quarrel with EMI over moneyVirgin Media to hearing piracy-detection program

EMI has suffered stretched family with the artists given it was paid for in 2007 by Terra Firma, the in isolation equity organisation run by Guy Hands. Sir Paul McCartney, the Rolling Stones and Radiohead have all give up given the takeover.

Pink Floyd have sole some-more than 200 million albums during their career and have been one of the companys majority remunerative acts. Sir Andrew Morritt, Chancellor of the High Court, supposed the groups arguments that EMI was firm by a stipulate stipulating that created agree was required for the sale of the element as anything alternative than finish albums.

The brawl centred on a line in the stipulate stating, there are no rights to sell any or all of the annals as singular records, alternative than with [Pink Floyds] permission. EMI claimed that this practical usually to earthy copies of songs, but the rope argued successfully that it additionally practical to songs sole online. The decider pronounced the role of a proviso in the stipulate was to safety the inventive firmness of the albums.

However, Pink Floyds song will go on to be sole as singles until alternative disputes in between the rope and EMI are resolved. Peter Jenner, who managed the organisation in the 1960s, pronounced that alternative bands would be expected to good from the ruling.

The preference has far wider implications than it essentially appears as it brings a lot of carry out behind to artists with regards to digital sales, he said.

Mark Krais, an consultant on song law at Bray and Krais solicitor, pronounced that Pink Floyds stipulate was expected to be singular to them, but could bear similarities with those of alternative groups.

I think that there are a little alternative luminary artists from the Seventies, Eighties and Nineties who will be seeking at contracts and meditative to themselves, Did I authorize for songs to be sole as singular marks as downloads?.

Sir Andrew refused EMI accede to interest and systematic that it compensate the bands 60,000 authorised costs. A orator for the association said: There are serve arguments to be listened and the box will go on for a little time.

hair wig